Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorCantero-Téllez, Raquel 
dc.contributor.authorValdes, Kristin
dc.contributor.authorSchwartz, Deborah A
dc.contributor.authorMedina-Porqueres, Iván 
dc.contributor.authorArias, Jean-Christophe
dc.contributor.authorVillafañe, Jorge Hugo
dc.date.accessioned2024-10-18T11:24:45Z
dc.date.available2024-10-18T11:24:45Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationCantero-Téllez R, Valdes K, Schwartz DA, Medina-Porqueres I, Arias JC, Villafañe JH. Necessity of Immobilizing the Metacarpophalangeal Joint in Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis: Short-term Effect. Hand (N Y). 2018 Jul;13(4):412-417. doi: 10.1177/1558944717708031. Epub 2017 May 19. PMID: 28525958; PMCID: PMC6081785.es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10630/34818
dc.description.abstractConservative treatment for carpometacarpal (CMC) joint osteoarthritis (OA) may include orthotic fabrication to decrease pain. Different types of orthoses have been used as conservative interventions to improve symptoms, but there are no guidelines specifying if inclusion of the thumb metacarpophalangeal (MCP) in an orthosis is required in the treatment of thumb CMC joint OA. The main objective of this study is to determine the effectiveness of 2 different thumb CMC joint orthotic designs on pain reduction and improved hand function: one design immobilizes both the MCP joint and the CMC joint and the other design immobilizes only the CMC joint. Methods: A total of 66 patients were included in the study. One group of 33 patients received a short thumb orthosis with the MCP joint excluded, and the other group of 33 patients received a short thumb orthosis with the MCP joint included. Outcomes measures included the visual analog scale for pain and the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH; Spanish version) for function. Results: In both patient groups, the orthoses contributed to decreased pain levels and improved functional abilities (F1.0 = 315.467 and F1.0 = 72.419; both, P < .001). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups regarding pain or improvement in daily activities (F1.0 = 0.553 and F1.0 = 2.539; both, P > .05). Conclusion: There are benefits of either thumb orthotic design on pain reduction and functional improvement even after 1 week of using the orthoses as the sole conservative treatment.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherSage Journalses_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectArtrosises_ES
dc.subjectArticulaciones - Enfermedadeses_ES
dc.subject.otherCarpometacarpal jointes_ES
dc.subject.otherHand functiones_ES
dc.subject.otherOsteoarthritises_ES
dc.subject.otherThumb orthoseses_ES
dc.subject.otherThumb paines_ES
dc.titleNecessity of Immobilizing the Metacarpophalangeal Joint in Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis: Short-Term Effectes_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.centroFacultad de Ciencias de la Saludes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1558944717708031
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem