JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Listar

    Todo RIUMAComunidades & ColeccionesPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasTipo de publicaciónCentrosDepartamentos/InstitutosEditoresEsta colecciónPor fecha de publicaciónAutoresTítulosMateriasTipo de publicaciónCentrosDepartamentos/InstitutosEditores

    Mi cuenta

    AccederRegistro

    Estadísticas

    Ver Estadísticas de uso

    DE INTERÉS

    Datos de investigaciónReglamento de ciencia abierta de la UMAPolítica de RIUMAPolitica de datos de investigación en RIUMAOpen Policy Finder (antes Sherpa-Romeo)Dulcinea
    Preguntas frecuentesManual de usoContacto/Sugerencias
    Ver ítem 
    •   RIUMA Principal
    • Investigación
    • Artículos
    • Ver ítem
    •   RIUMA Principal
    • Investigación
    • Artículos
    • Ver ítem

    A comparison of heating terminal units: Fan-coil versus radiant floor, and the combination of both

    • Autor
      Atienza-Márquez, Antonio; Fernández-Hernández, Francisco ÁngelAutoridad Universidad de Málaga; Domínguez-Muñoz, FernandoAutoridad Universidad de Málaga; Carrillo-Andrés, AntonioAutoridad Universidad de Málaga; Cejudo-López, José ManuelAutoridad Universidad de Málaga
    • Fecha
      2017
    • Editorial/Editor
      Elsevier
    • Palabras clave
      Calefacción por agua caliente
    • Resumen
      Several control strategies are compared for a hydronic heating system that combines two different terminal units, radiant floor and fan-coil, in the same thermal zone. The performance of the combined system is evaluated in terms of energy consumption and comfort level. The production unit is an air-water heat pump. Four control strategies are defined and compared using a TRNSYS model: one strategy is applied when only the radiant floor operates, two strategies (simply and improved) are applied when only the fan-coil operates, and one strategy is applied when both terminal units operate simultaneously. Simulations are undertaken for three major cities with different heating requirements. In terms of comfort, the combined system achieves the higher scores, ensuring comfort conditions during most of the heating season. In terms of energy consumption, the worst option is the one that uses a fan-coil with fixed air velocity and fixed inlet water temperature. Nonetheless, there are not important differences between the analysed control options. The energy consumption of the system is mainly influenced by the part load performance of the heat pump, although the differences are small.
    • URI
      https://hdl.handle.net/10630/32970
    • DOI
      https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.12.092
    • Compartir
      RefworksMendeley
    Mostrar el registro completo del ítem
    Ficheros
    2017_ENB_138_621-629_Preprint.pdf (1.524Mb)
    Colecciones
    • Artículos

    Estadísticas

    REPOSITORIO INSTITUCIONAL UNIVERSIDAD DE MÁLAGA
    REPOSITORIO INSTITUCIONAL UNIVERSIDAD DE MÁLAGA
     

     

    REPOSITORIO INSTITUCIONAL UNIVERSIDAD DE MÁLAGA
    REPOSITORIO INSTITUCIONAL UNIVERSIDAD DE MÁLAGA