Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorBlanco-Sepúlveda, Rafael 
dc.contributor.authorEnríquez Narváez, Francisco
dc.contributor.authorLima-Cueto, Francisco Javier 
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-09T10:49:51Z
dc.date.available2024-02-09T10:49:51Z
dc.date.created2024
dc.date.issued2021-07-10
dc.identifier.citationBlanco-Sepúlveda, R., Enríquez-Narváez, F., & Lima, F. (2021). Effectiveness of conservation agriculture (tillage vs. vegetal soil cover) to reduce water erosion in maize cultivation (Zea mays L.): An experimental study in the sub-humid uplands of Guatemala. Geoderma, 404, 115336.es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10630/30269
dc.description.abstractCultivated uplands in tropical latitudes are severely affected by soil water erosion. Conservation agriculture (CA) is specifically intended to control erosion. The aim of the present study is to analyse the effectiveness of CA measures to reduce the erosion in maize cultivation (Zea mays L.) on andosols in the mountains of southern Guatemala. The study was conducted over a three-year period, from 2017 to 2019, on three experimental plots managed under conventional tillage (CT), reduced tillage (RT) and no-tillage (NT). The results showed different rates of eroded soil surface between the three management systems: 73.2% under CT, 41.3% under RT and 20.4% under NT. Analysis of the complete database (n = 36) showed that the litter cover (ryl.p = –0.86, p < 0.001) and the soil disturbance (ryp.l = 0.57, p < 0.001) were, in that order, the factors with the greatest explanatory power of the eroded surface. The segmented analysis (n = 12) showed that the management system adopted had a decisive influence on the ground cover (litter and weed cover) and, therefore, on the soil erosion. Under CT, the eroded surface was only correlated with the weed cover (ryw.l = –0.68, p < 0.05), under NT only with the litter cover (ryl.w = –0.89, p < 0.001) and under RT the erosion did not correlate with either of the vegetal layers. Three conclusions are derived from this study. First, litter layer was the key explanatory factor of erosion. Second, this factor is highly influenced by the agricultural management system. The proportion and distribution of the litter layer in each management situation were key to explaine the different soil erosion rates between the three management systems. And finally, it is proposed for the area of this study the soil management under NT with a dense and well distributed litter cover.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Project ‘Transfer-monitoring-evaluation of soil erosion control measures for sustainable agricultural development in rural communities with high vulnerability to climate change in Chimaltenango (Guatemala)’, (Ref. 2020UI005), funded by the Andalusian Agency for International Cooperation (AACID), Spain, and by the Association for Welfare, Progress and Development, Guatemala.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
dc.subjectAgricultura de conservaciónes_ES
dc.subjectAgua - Erosiónes_ES
dc.subject.otherWater erosiones_ES
dc.subject.otherConventional tillagees_ES
dc.subject.otherReduced tillagees_ES
dc.subject.otherNo-tillagees_ES
dc.subject.otherLitter coveres_ES
dc.subject.otherWeed coveres_ES
dc.titleEffectiveness of conservation agriculture (tillage vs. vegetal soil cover) to reduce water erosion in maize cultivation (Zea mays L.): An experimental study in the sub-humid uplands of Guatemala.es_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.centroFacultad de Filosofía y Letrases_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115336
dc.type.hasVersionAMes_ES
dc.departamentoGeografía
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem