Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Orza, Javier 
dc.contributor.authorGutiérrez-Cordero, Ismael
dc.contributor.authorGuandalini, Martina
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-07T11:52:35Z
dc.date.available2024-02-07T11:52:35Z
dc.date.issued2020-07
dc.identifier.citationGarcía-Orza, J., Gutiérrez-Cordero, I., & Guandalini, M. (2020). Saying thirteen instead of forty-two but saying lale instead of tale: is number production special?. Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior, 128, 281–296.es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10630/29992
dc.description.abstractStimulus Type Effect on Phonological and Semantic errors (STEPS) occurs when a person, following brain damage, produces phonemic errors with non-number words (e.g., lale for tale), but produces semantic errors with number words (e.g., thirteen for forty-two). Despite the relative frequency of this phenomenon, it has received little scholarly attention thus far. To explain STEPS, the Building Blocks hypothesis has been proposed (Cohen, Verstichel, & Dehaene, 1997; Dotan & Friedmann, 2015): the phonological output buffer includes single phonemes as the units of speech production for words, whereas entire number words are the building blocks of multi-digit production. Impairment in the phonological output buffer results in the incorrect selection of these units, leading to phonemic errors when producing non-number words, but semantic errors when producing numbers. In the present study we consider two patients, one with a deficit in the phonological output buffer, and one with a deficit in the phonological input buffer but with a preserved phonological output buffer. Number word and non-number word repetition, naming, and reading abilities were assessed. As expected, STEPS was found in the patient with deficits in the phonological output buffer in the three tasks; more notably, evidence of STEPS was also found for the patient with deficits in the phonological input buffer in the repetition task. Since our results cannot be fully explained by the Building Blocks hypothesis in its present form, we discuss the suitability of this hypothesis for the current data, and consider alternative accounts of STEPS.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipThe study was supported by grants from the Universidad de Malaga-Andalucía Tech which were awarded to MG and IGC, respectively. This research was also partially funded by a grant from the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad: Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI16/01514).es_ES
dc.language.isospaes_ES
dc.publisherElsevieres_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.subjectAfasiaes_ES
dc.subject.otherConduction aphasiaes_ES
dc.subject.otherNumberses_ES
dc.subject.otherPhonemic errorses_ES
dc.subject.otherSemantic errorses_ES
dc.subject.otherWord productiones_ES
dc.titleSaying thirteen instead of forty-two but saying lale instead of tale: is number production special?es_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.centroFacultad de Psicología y Logopediaes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.cortex.2020.03.020
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem