Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorNogueras, Eva Vanesa
dc.contributor.authorCantero, Nazaret
dc.contributor.authorMacías, María
dc.contributor.authorMorales-Asencio, José Miguel 
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Herrera Pérez-Bryan, José María
dc.contributor.authorHurtado, María M.
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-24T10:37:52Z
dc.date.available2023-07-24T10:37:52Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.citationNogueras, E., Cantero, N., Macías, M., Morales-Asencio, J., García-Herrera Pérez-Bryan, J., & Hurtado, M. (2023). A multifaceted provider-centred intervention versus usual care to improve the recognition and diagnosis of depression in primary health care: A hybrid study. Primary Health Care Research & Development, 24, E45. doi:10.1017/S1463423623000300es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10630/27363
dc.description.abstractBackground: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a multifaceted intervention to implement an adapted guideline for the management of depression in primary health care. Methods: A hybrid trial was carried out to determine the effect of a multicomponent provider centred intervention to improve the detection and diagnosis of depression in primary care, as part of the guideline implementation process, and to collect information about barriers and facilitators in a real-world context. Before the multicomponent intervention, a descriptive cross-sectional study was performed to assess the population prevalence of depression in the participating health centres and to detect possible differences. Subsequently, a quasi experimental two-phase study was carried out with a concurrent control group to assess the impact of the multicomponent intervention on the main outcomes (detection of depression, evaluation of its severity and the use of structured methods to support the diagnosis). Results: Nine-hundred seventy-four patients took part in the first phase. According to their clinical records, the prevalence of depression ranged from 7.2% to 7.9%, and there were no significant differences between the health centres scheduled to receive the intervention and those in the control group. In the experimental phase, 797 randomly selected participants received the multicomponent intervention. Adjusted multivariable analysis performed before the implementation revealed no significant differences in depression between the experimental and control groups. However, after the intervention, modest but significant differences were observed, which persisted at 1 year after the intervention. Conclusions: A multicomponent intervention for the implementation of a clinical guideline for the management of depression in primary care produced improvements in the identification of depression and in the degree of severity recorded.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding for open access charge: Universidad de Málaga.es_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherCambridge University Presses_ES
dc.rightsAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectPsicología clínicaes_ES
dc.subjectPsicosis maniacodepresivaes_ES
dc.subject.otherDepressiones_ES
dc.subject.otherDiagnostic tests (PHQ-9)es_ES
dc.subject.otherMood disorderes_ES
dc.subject.otherMental healthes_ES
dc.subject.otherPractice managementes_ES
dc.subject.otherPrimary carees_ES
dc.subject.otherPsychiatryes_ES
dc.titleA multifaceted provider-centred intervention versus usual care to improve the recognition and diagnosis of depression in primary health care: a hybrid studyes_ES
dc.typejournal articlees_ES
dc.centroFacultad de Ciencias de la Saludes_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1463423623000300
dc.type.hasVersionVoRes_ES
dc.departamentoEnfermería
dc.rights.accessRightsopen accesses_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem