Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorDíaz-Mohedo, Esther 
dc.contributor.authorOdriozola Aguirre, Itxaso
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-08T18:13:53Z
dc.date.available2023-03-08T18:13:53Z
dc.date.issued2023-02-14
dc.identifier.citationDíaz-Mohedo E, Odriozola Aguirre I, Molina García E, Infantes-Rosales MA, Hita-Contreras F. Functional Exercise Versus Specific Pelvic Floor Exercise: Observational Pilot Study in Female University Students. Healthcare. 2023; 11(4):561. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11040561es_ES
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/10630/26112
dc.description.abstractObjectives: To evaluate the electromyographic (EMG) activity of the pelvic floor musculature (PFM) that takes place when performing the functional movement screen (FMS) exercise, comparing it with the activation in the maximum voluntary contraction of PFM in the supine position (MVC-SP) and standing (MVC-ST). Material and Methods: A descriptive, observational study conducted in two phases. In the first study phase, the baseline EMG activity of PFM was measured in the supine position and standing during MVC-SP and MVC-ST and during the execution of the seven exercises that make up the FMS. In the second phase of the study, the baseline EMG activity of PFM was measured in the supine position and standing during MVC-SP and MVC-ST and during the FMS exercise that produced the most EMG in the pilot phase: trunk stability push-up (PU). ANOVA, Friedman’s and Pearson’s tests were used. Results: All FMS exercises performed in the pilot phase showed a value below 100% maximum voluntary contraction (MVC) except PU, which presented an average value of 101.3 μv (SD = 54.5): 112% MVC (SD = 37.6). In the second phase of the study, it was observed that there were no significant differences (p = 0.087) between the three exercises performed: MVC-SP, MVC-ST and PU (39.2 μv (SD = 10.4), 37.5 μv (SD = 10.4) and 40.7 μv (SD = 10.2), respectively). Conclusions: There is no evidence of the existence of significant differences in EMG activation in PFM among the three exercises analysed: MVC-SP, MVC-ST and PU. The results show better EMG values in the functional exercise of PU.es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipPartial funding for open access charge: Universidad de Málagaes_ES
dc.language.isoenges_ES
dc.publisherIOAP-MDPIes_ES
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_ES
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.subjectFisioterapiaes_ES
dc.subject.otherPelvic floores_ES
dc.subject.otherFunctional exercisees_ES
dc.subject.otherKegel exercisees_ES
dc.subject.otherElectromyographyes_ES
dc.subject.otherWomenes_ES
dc.subject.otherPush-upes_ES
dc.titleFunctional Exercise Versus Specific Pelvic Floor Exercise: Observational Pilot Study in Female University Studentses_ES
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_ES
dc.centroFacultad de Ciencias de la Saludes_ES
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11040561
dc.rights.ccAtribución 4.0 Internacional*
dc.type.hasVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES


Ficheros en el ítem

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Atribución 4.0 Internacional
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como Atribución 4.0 Internacional